0
DriveOnline

Further Resources

The Brutal Truth About Managing Remote Teams: What Nobody Tells You

Related Reading:

Remote work isn't the productivity paradise everyone pretends it is. There, I said it.

After 17 years of managing teams across Melbourne, Sydney, and Perth, I've watched more remote work initiatives crash and burn than I care to count. Yet here we are in 2025, still pretending that giving someone a laptop and a Zoom account magically transforms them into a self-directed productivity machine.

The Uncomfortable Reality Check

Let's start with something that'll ruffle feathers: most people aren't naturally suited to remote work. About 67% of employees (based on my own observations across various client companies) struggle with the transition beyond the initial honeymoon period. They miss the structure, the casual conversations, the ability to walk over to someone's desk when they're stuck.

But here's where it gets interesting. The ones who do thrive remotely? They're usually your best performers anyway. It's like giving a Ferrari better fuel – you were already getting great results.

The mediocre performers, though. That's where remote work becomes a management nightmare.

I remember one client in Brisbane – won't name names, but they're in the logistics space – who went fully remote during the pandemic. Within six months, their bottom 30% of performers had essentially become invisible. Not fired, mind you. Just... present enough to avoid attention while contributing roughly the same as a potted plant.

What Actually Works (And What Doesn't)

Daily check-ins are rubbish. There, another unpopular opinion.

If you need to check in with someone every single day to ensure they're working, you've hired the wrong person. It's that simple. Daily check-ins become performative theatre where everyone pretends to be busy while actual work suffers.

Weekly one-on-ones, however? Gold standard. Gives people enough rope to either hang themselves or build something impressive. Plus, it respects the fact that knowledge work doesn't happen in neat little daily packages.

The biggest mistake I see managers make is trying to replicate office culture online. You can't. Stop trying to have virtual coffee chats and online team building exercises. Your team sees right through it, and frankly, it's embarrassing for everyone involved.

Instead, focus on what remote work actually enables: deep work periods, flexible scheduling around peak performance times, and the elimination of commute stress. These are real benefits, not the manufactured camaraderie of forced Zoom social hours.

The Trust Paradox

Here's something that might make traditional managers uncomfortable: managing remote teams requires giving up control to gain control. Sounds like management consultant nonsense, but stick with me.

When someone works from home, you can't see if they're at their desk at 9 AM sharp. You can't monitor their lunch breaks or notice if they're having personal phone calls. This terrifies micromanagers. But here's the thing – if you were relying on visual supervision to ensure productivity, you were never really managing in the first place.

I had a client – small accounting firm in Perth – whose owner was convinced remote work would destroy his business. "How do I know they're actually working?" he asked. My response was simple: "How do you know they're working when they're in the office?"

The uncomfortable truth is that presence doesn't equal productivity. Never has, never will.

Results-based performance management becomes non-negotiable with remote teams. Either someone delivers quality work on time, or they don't. Their location while doing (or not doing) that work is irrelevant.

The Communication Trap

Everyone talks about over-communicating with remote teams. Wrong focus entirely.

The issue isn't the quantity of communication – it's the quality and intentionality. Most remote communication is reactive rather than proactive. Team members wait until they're stuck before reaching out, then wonder why projects stall.

Smart remote managers create structured communication rhythms that prevent problems rather than solve them. Weekly project updates (not daily check-ins), monthly strategic reviews, and quarterly planning sessions. This creates predictable touchpoints that allow for course correction without micromanagement.

But here's what nobody tells you: remote work amplifies existing communication problems. If your team struggled with clarity and alignment in the office, remote work will make it worse, not better. You can't solve fundamental communication issues by switching platforms.

The Technology Red Herring

Stop obsessing over tools. Seriously.

I've watched companies spend months evaluating project management software, collaboration platforms, and communication tools, thinking the right technology will solve their remote work challenges. It won't.

The best remote teams I've worked with often use surprisingly basic tool stacks. Slack, Google Workspace, maybe a simple project tracker. That's it. They succeed because they have clear processes and mutual accountability, not because they found the perfect software solution.

Meanwhile, I've seen teams with enterprise-grade collaboration suites that can't get basic project coordination right. All the bells and whistles in the world won't fix unclear expectations or poor planning.

What They Don't Tell You About Remote Hiring

Hiring for remote positions requires completely different assessment criteria. Skills that matter in office environments – like being physically present for impromptu meetings or reading room dynamics – become irrelevant.

Instead, you need to assess for self-direction, written communication skills, and what I call "productive paranoia" – the ability to anticipate problems and communicate about them before they become crises.

Traditional interview processes are terrible at identifying these traits. You need to create scenarios that test remote-specific competencies. Give candidates a sample project with unclear requirements and see how they handle the ambiguity. Evaluate their written communication through email exchanges rather than just verbal interviews.

The best remote hires often come from unexpected backgrounds. Some of my most successful remote placements have been career changers or people returning to work after breaks. They approach remote work with intentionality rather than trying to replicate previous office experiences.

The Productivity Myth

Remote work doesn't automatically increase productivity. Sometimes it does the opposite.

Without the natural boundaries that office environments provide, many remote workers struggle with overwork rather than underwork. They feel pressure to prove they're being productive, leading to longer hours and decreased quality.

Smart remote managers actually need to protect their teams from working too much. Set clear expectations about response times for emails and messages. Establish genuine boundaries around after-hours communication. Model healthy remote work behaviours yourself.

I've seen too many managers who demand immediate responses to Slack messages while their teams are supposedly enjoying "flexible" remote work. You can't have it both ways.

The Isolation Factor

Remote work can be isolating, but the solution isn't forced socialisation. It's creating genuine opportunities for professional connection and growth.

Mentorship becomes more important in remote environments, not less. Junior team members miss out on the casual learning that happens through observation and overhearing conversations. You need to structure these learning opportunities deliberately.

Consider setting up cross-functional project teams, rotating partnerships for specific initiatives, or creating informal knowledge-sharing sessions where team members present their work to colleagues. These serve dual purposes – professional development and relationship building.

The Bottom Line

Managing remote teams successfully requires fundamentally different skills than managing office teams. Many traditional managers haven't made this transition, which is why remote work gets a bad reputation.

The organisations that truly excel at remote work treat it as a distinct management discipline, not just "office work from a different location." They invest in developing remote management capabilities, restructure their processes around asynchronous collaboration, and hire specifically for remote work success.

Remote work isn't for everyone – not every role, not every person, not every company culture. But when done well, it can unlock levels of productivity and employee satisfaction that traditional office environments struggle to match.

The key is being honest about what it actually requires, rather than pretending it's just a simple location change.


Additional Resources: